The Federal High Court, Abuja, on Tuesday, dismissed a suit by the Peoples Democratic Party seeking to strip a Benue State House of Assembly member, representing Okpokwu Constituency, Anthony Attah, of his seat, following his defection to the All Progressives Congress.

Justice Muhammed Umar, in a judgment in suit FHC/ABJ/CS/2408/2025, held that, although, Attah did not deny defecting from the PDP to the APC, the court could not assume the constitutional powers vested in the Speaker and the Benue State House of Assembly to declare his seat vacant.

The PDP had sued the Independent National Electoral Commission, the APC and Attah, asking the court to determine, among other issues, whether votes cast for the party could be transferred to another political party after a legislator defects.

The party also sought declarations that Attah’s continued occupation of the seat after his defection was unlawful, that all legislative actions taken since his defection were null and void, and that he should refund salaries and other privileges received after leaving the PDP.

In the judgment, Justice Umar observed that the plaintiff’s case borders on the defection of the third defendant who won the election and noted that the third defendant did not deny his defection to the second defendant.

The judge, however, held that the constitutional procedure for declaring the seat vacant had not been completed.

The court held that the announcement of the defection of the 3rd defendant from the plaintiff to the 2nd defendant is not enough.

Justice Umar also explained that under Section 109 of the 1999 Constitution, the House of Assembly must first declare the seat vacant, after which the Speaker is required to communicate the vacancy to INEC for the conduct of a bye-election.

He held that unless and until this is done, the 1st defendant cannot act,” adding, “Therefore, this court cannot usurp the powers of the Speaker or the honourable members of the House of Assembly.”

The judge also rejected the preliminary objection challenging the competence of the suit, holding that the originating summons disclosed a reasonable cause of action.

Justice Umar dismissed the substantive suit, concluded that On the whole, the application has no value, and it is hereby dismissed.